Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    • Home
    • About
    • Contact
    • Terms of Use
    • Help Wanted
    • Advertising
    • Patreon
    • Merch
    RSS Instagram Facebook X (Twitter) YouTube
    Life on the Swingset
    • Podcasts
      1. Life on the Swingset: The Podcast
        • Episodes
        • Subscribe on iTunes
        • Subscribe on Google Play
        • Feed
        • Stitcher.com
      2. Intellectual Foreplay
        • Episodes
        • Subscribe on iTunes
        • Subscribe on Google Play
        • Feed
      3. Multiamory
        • Episodes
        • Feed
        • Subscribe on iTunes
        • Subscribe on Stitcher
      4. By the Bi
        • Episodes
        • Subscribe on iTunes
        • Stitcher.com
      5. On The Wet Coast
        • Episodes
      6. Sex Ed a Go Go
        • Episodes
        • Subscribe on iTunes
        • Feed
      Featured
      November 26, 20240

      #405 – Squicks or Turn-Ons?

      Recent
      November 26, 2024

      #405 – Squicks or Turn-Ons?

      November 17, 2024

      #403 – User Manual, or Dungeon Crawl? What’s Your Preference?

      November 1, 2024

      #402 – More Than Two, Second Edition – With Andrea Zanin and Eve Rickert

    • Blogs
      1. Cooper’s Blog
      2. Ginger & The Professor
      3. Technogeisha’s Blog
      4. On The Wetcoast
      5. Ms. Scarlet Blogs
      6. Swimming Against The Stream
      Featured
      February 28, 20211

      SS 389: Nerdy Banter with Simone and Malcolm – The Pragmatist’s Guide to Sexuality

      Recent
      February 28, 2021

      SS 389: Nerdy Banter with Simone and Malcolm – The Pragmatist’s Guide to Sexuality

      January 31, 2021

      SS 388: The Power of Witness in Relationship Therapy with Catherine

      November 23, 2020

      SS 387: Euretic Consent with Shawn Coleman and Kevin Patterson

    • Articles
      • Advice
    • Desire ’21
    • Reviews
      1. Product Reviews
      2. Book Reviews
      3. Media Reviews
      4. Site Reviews
      Featured
      8.7
      May 20, 20170

      Review: G-Spot Lollipops – Travel Edition

      Recent
      October 15, 2019

      Review: DiGiT, by Hot Octopuss

      December 19, 2018

      Review: Inside Out, by Womanizer

      10.0
      October 13, 2018

      Review: Blush Novelties Avant D2 and Avant D4

    • Support
      • Patreon
      • Merchandise
      • Tip Jar
    • Store
      • Swingset Stickers
      • Shirts
      • Cooper’s Books
    Life on the Swingset
    Love Without Commitment: Non-Monogamy is a Sliding Scale

    Love Without Commitment: Non-Monogamy is a Sliding Scale

    2
    By Harper Eliot on June 14, 2013 Blogs, The Novice Non-Monogamist, Written

    Love Without Commitment: Non-Monogamy is a Sliding ScaleThe various forms and facets of non-monogamy are often on my mind. Perhaps it’s all the podcasts I listen to and all the blogs I read. Or perhaps it’s because I have only identified as non-monogamous for five months, which is not a long time when it comes to something so significant. Either way, since the beginning of 2013, non-monogamy has been close to my thoughts at all times.

    In my mind, I sort non-monogamy into three main categories: swinging, open, and polyamory. However, I also view non-monogamy as a sliding scale. There are so many degrees of variation, and for me, these three are simply the most prominent points on that scale; or perhaps just the points that have been most decidedly titled. So when I meet someone who is non-monogamous and they tell me “I am a swinger” or  “I am polyamorous” or however that person identifies, I never take that as the end of the conversation. To me these terms are ways of categorizing, in order to make conversation easier; they are not hard and fast rules.

    However, there is one area where the lines seem a little clearer cut. Or at least the intentions seem clearer. When it comes to depth of emotional involvement, I have rarely heard discussions of much crossover: people who identify as swingers, talk in terms of sexual attraction; people in open relationships tend to refer to casual but ongoing secondary partners; and polyamorists deal with love. I do, occasionally, get the impression that these boundaries of emotion – which are naturally more complex anyway – can become blurred, but for the most part, if you love more than one person, it seems that polyamorous is how you identify. This makes sense as polyamory literally means “many loves”. However, in common parlance, polyamory also infers multiple significant relationships; socially, polyamory is not just loving more than one person, but engaging in deep, committed relationships with more than one person. Of course, this raises questions about how we define “commitment”, but generally speaking I think you can understand my point.

    And this seems like an almost natural reaction: if you are in love with someone, you want to have a certain level of commitment with that person, right? It’s true in monogamy as well; in so many cases, our depth of feeling dictates our depth of commitment. But here’s the thing: how, then, do you identify if you love more than one person, but only wish to commit yourself to one?

    Even when I was monogamous, I experienced this. Last year I was deeply in love with a man with whom it was very clear the relationship would always be casual. Neither of us were under any misconceptions, and I was happy to love him just as it was. I understand that for many, the magnitude of love seems to demand a certain level of commitment and partnership, but this is not true for all. Whilst I do dream of being with someone and having both love and commitment with him, for me the former is highly possible without the latter.

    Socially, it doesn’t matter which term I most closely identify with. The general public doesn’t need to know the intricate details of my sexuality or relationships. But I have found, that without a fairly clear descriptor, dating becomes more difficult. It is not easy to explain to potential partners that I may be in love with several people, but I only want one core relationship; that I have no desire to get over the people I am in love with, but that I don’t necessarily want to be committed to them either. I suppose it’s just another conversation to be had.

    Despite wishing that non-monogamy were a little more prevalent, the fact that it is still outside what most people would consider “normal relationships” can actually be a good thing when it comes to figuring myself out. With so much to explain and explore within our society, the rules of non-monogamy are not nearly as set as they are in monogamy. Although I wish this would change as well, certain assumptions are made when two people are in a monogamous relationship. But when it comes to non-monogamy, these assumptions do not exist, because society hasn’t created them. Or at the very least, there are fewer assumptions. What this means is that every non-monogamous person is encouraged to find, alter, and choose their own personal relationship model. So in the end, whilst I can’t quite find a term for myself that will help the conversation flow, I am at least under an umbrella term – non-monogamy – that always requires discussion and exploration, rather than sitting with the weight of numerous social expectations. And I do rather like carving my own path.

    Tweet
    Share
    Reddit
    Buffer
    Pin
    Email
    0 Shares
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleSwinging Local: Ultimate Fantasy or Worst Nightmare, Part III
    Next Article Review: Icicles No. 31 by Pipedreams Products – A Great Glass G-Spotter
    Harper Eliot
    • Website
    • Facebook
    • X (Twitter)

    Harper Eliot is a writer and podcaster whose work mainly centers around eroticism and social observation. You can find an archive of work, and links to all her other projects, on her website Harper Eliot. Harper lives in London, but rarely sees her own house, spending most of her time on public transport, listening to podcasts and tweeting too much. Her vices include cigarettes, lubricant, Earl Grey tea, opera, nail polish, and pinwheels.

    Related Posts

    #402 – More Than Two, Second Edition – With Andrea Zanin and Eve Rickert

    SS 398: Swingset as a Place… with Princess Vi

    SS 397: …and at least one amorous bird on this resort. – Swingset Takes Desire 2022, Part 2

    2 Comments

    1. Violet on June 14, 2013 11:46 am

      Harper – I know exactly what you mean. I identify as polyamorous as I am in love with 3 men right now, but I still go and play at swinger type events alone or with 2 of the 3. So what does that make me? Do I care? Not really. I am clear about what I am/have been looking for with all potential new partners. Some don’t get it. I prefer the ones that do.

      The commitment thing is tricky. One person’s definition could be another person’s definition of confinement. It evolves, I think, with the relationship. Communication about expectations and feelings is required. Maybe even what some people would consider over communication. I prefer to be very clear – it avoids hurt feelings and wrong assumptions. But that’s what works for me and my poly posse.

      Reply
      • Harper Eliot on June 14, 2013 4:45 pm

        Oh, I completely agree: I like to be very clear as well. Some have read that as being cold-hearted, or even cruel, but I am a strong believer in brutal honesty. With a touch of a respect – yes – but I’m always honest, from the get-go.

        Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    The Latest Life on the Swingset
    Become a Patron!
    Kasidie.com... Plays Well With Others.

    Copyright &copy 2010-2019 – Life on the Swingset – All Rights Reserved

    Copyright &copy 2010-2019 - Life on the Swingset - All Rights Reserved

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.